What’s the best way to discuss casino game strategies without spoilers?

In describing gaming strategies, provide the basics, but let users decide the rest -- e.g., talk about rankings, hands, wagers, and percentages rather than specific moves; emphasize that some players might choose one option over another based on certain conditions, but don't dictate what to do (e. g. tell users that, “Some players may choose to hit or hold in this situation, ” but don’t say, “Always hit 16”); discuss general considerations rather than making direct recommendations; and use the wiki to organize information about rules, mathematics, and strategy in such a way that there is not too much detail; use forums and community discussions to ask questions that enable users to determine the best course of action (e. g. , “What is your thought process when deciding whether to split a pair of aces? ”), and allow users to work it out (providing them with relevant data and resources if necessary); and provide enough resources to help users make appropriate decisions, but don’t reveal how the cards will fall.

Avoid *tactics*. Instead, discuss *concepts*, such as budgeting, risk aversion, and odds-driven choices. Compare actions to other things where the reader may have some intuition about risks and rewards (such as betting on a long-shot horse). Tactics should be discussed in "families", such as high-risk and low-risk approaches; avoid concrete examples. But do feel free to provide examples of how players think and what they hope to achieve. The idea is that readers will learn how to think, not what to do.

Avoid details. Think attitude, money, and math. “Bets with higher returns” or “ways to lower the house advantage. ” Don’t mention specific bets or payoffs. Give advice, let people choose. Say “find low-volatile games” rather than “bet red on the wheel” Don’t ruin the game!